Rugby Football Union court ruling that the impact site online ticket exchange Viagogo inflated prices by selling those tickets at Twickenham will be able to identify is appreciated.England's RFU case 2010 autumn internationals and Six Nations table on 2011 stadium. The RFU Viagogo accused of any wrongdoing did not, he claimed that "as found in help or" the alleged wrongdoing by others.
RFU successfully argued that, when the face value of tickets, license or permission ticket is automatically canceled by or represented at a higher price are transferred so that the benefits of such a ticket entry Contains is a trespasser.
The RFU business operations director, Paul Vaughan, said: "We are delighted to have been granted this order, which means that Viagogo will need to supply us with information about anyone who placed tickets for sale on their site from the Investec Internationals in November and this year's Six Nations.
"Once we get that information we will then decide what action to take against those individuals, clubs or educational institutions. Any Twickenham Stadium match tickets which appear for sale on Viagogo are effectively 'black market' tickets.
"Our action in tackling Viagogo head on in the court shows that we take the strongest stance possible against these marketplaces and regularly police them as far as we are able.
"Individuals who believe they have anonymity by trading their tickets through such secondary sales sites are no longer invisible and we will do our utmost to ensure that tickets go to genuine fans rather than people who wish to profit."
Other similar before RFU Rugby World Cup 2015 hosting web sites for this position now and in their battles against black market will benefit other sports will consider expected.
Granting disclosure, Mr Justice Tugendhat had said: "I conclude that RFU has no straightforward or available means of finding out the information it seeks by this application and that the making of the order sought is necessary."
He said that if any such resales that the legitimate purpose of promoting the game was because of weak doubt.
"The fact that this is not financial damage is immaterial in my judgment."
He is "no merit" claim the RFU's Viagogo case of real intention receive from advertising website to alert users of potential damage to his business was used to reject as Given.
